Little Brother by Cory Doctorow
I’m willing to bear with a writer whose style is less than polished if they have — or seem to have — good ideas. I’m willing to set aside wooden characterization if it serves a larger purpose. I’ll accept a little glossing over if the intentions are good. I’m even willing to ignore large holes in ideology if the story is good. Unfortunately for Cory Doctorow’s Little Brother (2008), the combination of these flaws is too heavy. With all of these issues glaringly apparent, the novel is nothing more than inconsistent, juvenile fiction which complains about society’s problems in conspiracy theory fashion rather than offering imaginative, plausible solutions. When raising the red flag, it’s best to have your ideas formed before making the effort.
Little Brother is the story of the highschooler Cory Doc — I mean, Marcus Yallow — and his super-ideological, super-technical battle with the Department of Homeland. In the wake of another major terrorist attack, this time in San Francisco, the US government passes what is essentially Patriot Act II. As a result, the city is inundated with Orwellian security that has the legal right to track and interrogate people as it sees fit. Our hero, literally quoting from the Constitution, sets about undermining their attempts at complete control through the creation of his own underground intranet, the Xnet. So candy-sweet perfect it makes your teeth hurt, Yallow wages his ideological struggle while living a dual life: one half teenage Che Guevara, the other a mild mannered wonder boy who does no wrong and is super-intelligent beyond his 16 years. And did I mention the girls which dig his anarchist ways? Yes, it seems Yallow can do no wrong and lives every juvenile fantasy as a result: women tearing their clothes off on one hand, homemade computer on the other.
All of this would be no bother if Doctorow weren’t at the same time trying to hammer home his version of freedom. I emphasize “his version,” as it seems he hasn’t quite settled on the details himself. At one point in the novel he interprets the First Amendment as having limits, the example being that you cannot run into a crowded building and shout “Fire!” However, when closing in on the novel’s climax, our hero Cory — dammit! — Yallow stands up for his freedoms by convincing his loyal Xnetters to flash mob and play dead, which of course causes a similar situation to — you guessed it — shouting “Fire!” in a theater. Panic ensues and the regal, stable society of Doctorow’s vision comes crashing down in one grand contradiction. Sorry, the actions don’t match the words. Game over. Please, think again.
The second major ideological issue of the novel is Yallow’s relationship with his family. All throughout, we are shown how much they love and care for each other. The support Yallow’s family gives him is unfailing throughthe problems that arise from his secret double life. But again, as the novel nears its conclusion, an ugly contradiction raises its head. At the drop of a hat, Yallow packs his things and leaves, abandons his family without a thought, and remains aloof of the harm that might befall them in the chaos he intends to unleash. Now that’s consistent love for the family!!
In the end, this is a YA book that will have little crossover appeal. The manner in which Doctorow sets about educating the reader with regards to web infrastructure, coding, and cryptology are like a parent to child. There is no subtlety. Secondly, the main character is too obviously a teenage fantasy of the author’s visions of himself in high school. (After all, what high school boy wouldn’t want to lose his virginity, win a techno-war with the government via his XBox, and see his vision of a perfect society emplaced?) Sorry, but deconstructing an inflicted system with contradictory ideologies without a solution to clean up the mess only makes the problem worse. Fighting chaos with chaos only gains you more … you guessed it, chaos. Doctorow’s over-handed proselytizing of this point is just too much for me to recommend this book. If that isn’t enough, the implausible manner in which our hero escapes in the climax … But I desist. Little Brother is techno-anarchy for juveniles. If you want a good book, read the Big Brother: Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Little Brother — (2008-2013) Publisher: Marcus, a.k.a “w1n5t0n,” is only seventeen years old, but he figures he already knows how the system works — and how to work the system. Smart, fast, and wise to the ways of the networked world, he has no trouble outwitting his high school’s intrusive but clumsy surveillance systems. But his whole world changes when he and his friends find themselves caught in the aftermath of a major terrorist attack on San Francisco. In the wrong place at the wrong time, Marcus and his crew are apprehended by the Department of Homeland Security and whisked away to a secret prison where they’re mercilessly interrogated for days. When the DHS finally releases them, Marcus discovers that his city has become a police state where every citizen is treated like a potential terrorist. He knows that no one will believe his story, which leaves him only one option: to take down the DHS himself.
Actually, Marion, if you search through our site here for my old review of "Blood Freak," you'll see that I…
I think one-and-a-half stars is the lowest rating I've ever seen you give!
Kind of you to say. I certainly like to think so!
BTW, Steve Sterner will be performing at seven films during this upcoming fest: https://filmforum.org/series/clara-bow
As far as I know, Bill, Steve Sterner is the only person who does the live accompaniment to silent movies…