We: An early dystopian masterpiece from Russia

We by Yevgeny Zamyatin SFF book reviewsWe by Yevgeny Zamyatin

fantasy book reviews science fiction book reviewsYevgeny Zamyatin’s We is widely recognized as a direct influence on George Orwell when composing his dystopian masterpiece Nineteen Eighty-Four, and there are certainly strong signs of influence in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World as well. Zamyatin edited Russian translations of works of Jack London and H.G. Wells, and We can be viewed as a reaction against the optimistic scientific socialist utopias promoted by Wells. (Note: Aldous Huxley claimed no influence from We, stating that he was also opposed to the utopian ideals of H.G. Wells.)

How does the book read now, almost 100 years after its first English publication? Would it not be so dated as to be unreadable?

One must consider all the cataclysmic events that have happened since We was written: World War II, the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War between the US and the USSR, the fall of the Soviet Union, the economic rise of Japan and more recently China (where communism still exists but has been greatly tempered by the forge of capitalism) and the increasing globalization of the world’s economies — not to mention the innumerable list of technological inventions, not least of which are computers and the internet.

It’s hard to read We without all the baggage that readers are equipped with as members of today’s world, including all the dystopian SF books and films that have come since then. Even now some of the most popular YA books include Suzanne CollinsTHE HUNGER GAMES trilogy and Veronica Roth’s DIVERGENT series. But when Zamyatin published We back in 1924, there weren’t many earlier dystopian works other than Jack London’s The Iron Heel (published in 1907).

We itself is a very powerful exploration of a totalitarian society gone mad, where happiness is defined as the absence of free will, and emotions are considered mental illness. All individuals only have letters and numbers to distinguish them, society is completely regimented with mathematical precision by the government (headed by the iron-fisted Well-Doer), and public executions of any aberrant Numbers are carried out by the Well-Doer under the Benefactor’s Machine. Nature is suppressed outside a Wall that encloses a perfectly organized geometrical glass city where citizens live like clockwork, regimented by the Tables of Hours down to their waking, working, exercise, eating, and even copulation. The story revolves around D-503, builder of the Integral spaceship, which is intended to go forth and subject other planets to the benign dictatorship of the One Ship. He gets involved with a dissident temptress named I-330, who drags him unwillingly into a plot to overthrow and destroy the United State (referred to as the One State in some translations).

The storyline now seems fairly familiar to modern readers, and Zamyatin’s writing, although beautifully poetic and very impressionistic, was also for that same reason often incoherent and confusing. Much time is spent describing the inner mental turmoil of D-503 as he struggles with the conflicting imperatives of his perfect geometric existence and love of mathematics and the wild, illogical, passionate, and manipulative I-330. There is so much soul-searching and internal debate that the story itself really takes a back seat to the battle seething in D-503’s mind.

In the final analysis, although We succeeds marvelously in criticizing the absurdity of scientific utopias and the horrors of Soviet totalitarianism, in many ways it fails as a conventional narrative. For that reason, it may not have the same towering stature as a dystopian masterpiece in Western popular culture that Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World have, though it fully deserves it.We by Yevgeny Zamyatin,

~Stuart Starosta

We by Yevgeny Zamyatin SFF book reviewsWe, written by a disillusioned, imprisoned, and exiled Russian dissident, is the dystopian novel kids should be reading in high school. I recommend Tantor Audio’s edition which is read by one of my favorite narrators, Grover Gardner.  

~Kat Hooper

Published in 1924. Before Brave New World… Before 1984… There was… WE. In the One State of the great Benefactor, there are no individuals, only numbers. Life is an ongoing process of mathematical precision, a perfectly balanced equation. Primitive passions and instincts have been subdued. Even nature has been defeated, banished behind the Green Wall. But one frontier remains: outer space. Now, with the creation of the spaceship Integral, that frontier — and whatever alien species are to be found there — will be subjugated to the beneficent yoke of reason. One number, D-503, chief architect of the Integral, decides to record his thoughts in the final days before the launch for the benefit of less advanced societies. But a chance meeting with the beautiful 1-330 results in an unexpected discovery that threatens everything D-503 believes about himself and the One State. The discovery — or rediscovery — of inner space…and that disease the ancients called the soul. A page-turning SF adventure, a masterpiece of wit and black humor that accurately predicted the horrors of Stalinism, We is the classic dystopian novel. Its message of hope and warning is as timely at the end of the twentieth century as it was at the beginning.

FOLLOW:  Facebooktwitterrsstumblr  SHARE:  Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail
If you plan to buy this book, you can support FanLit by clicking on the book cover above and buying it (and anything else) at Amazon. It costs you nothing extra, but Amazon pays us a small referral fee. Click any book cover or this link. We use this income to keep the site running. It pays for website hosting, postage for giveaways, and bookmarks and t-shirts. Thank you!

STUART STAROSTA, on our staff from March 2015 to November 2018, is a lifelong SFF reader who makes his living reviewing English translations of Japanese equity research. Despite growing up in beautiful Hawaii, he spent most of his time reading as many SFF books as possible. After getting an MA in Japanese-English translation in Monterey, CA, he lived in Tokyo, Japan for about 15 years before moving to London in 2017 with his wife, daughter, and dog named Lani. Stuart's reading goal is to read as many classic SF novels and Hugo/Nebula winners as possible, David Pringle's 100 Best SF and 100 Best Fantasy Novels, along with newer books & series that are too highly-praised to be ignored. His favorite authors include Philip K Dick, China Mieville, Iain M. Banks, N.K. Jemisin, J.G. Ballard, Lucius Shepard, Neal Stephenson, Kurt Vonnegut, George R.R. Martin, Neil Gaiman, Robert Silverberg, Roger Zelazny, Ursula K. LeGuin, Guy Gavriel Kay, Arthur C. Clarke, H.G. Wells, Olaf Stapledon, J.R.R. Tolkien, Mervyn Peake, etc.

View all posts by

KAT HOOPER, who started this site in June 2007, earned a Ph.D. in neuroscience and psychology at Indiana University (Bloomington) and now teaches and conducts brain research at the University of North Florida. When she reads fiction, she wants to encounter new ideas and lots of imagination. She wants to view the world in a different way. She wants to have her mind blown. She loves beautiful language and has no patience for dull prose, vapid romance, or cheesy dialogue. She prefers complex characterization, intriguing plots, and plenty of action. Favorite authors are Jack Vance, Robin Hobb, Kage Baker, William Gibson, Gene Wolfe, Richard Matheson, and C.S. Lewis.

View all posts by

One comment

  1. I think I read this in the 1970s. Have they shortened the numeric designations (names) of some characters? Like many Russian novels, I had trouble keeping names straight and I thought they were longer. If I recall correctly, there was a lot of plastic, and I remember that being jarring to me.

Review this book and/or Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published.