The Warm Hands of Ghosts by Katherine Arden
I was a big fan of Katherine Arden’s WINTERNIGHT TRILOGY and ended my review of that series by saying I was greatly looking forward to seeing what she did next. Well, what’s next is The Warm Hands of Ghosts (2024), a standalone historical novel set in the horrors of WWI that happily mostly maintains the high bar of quality Arden set with that earlier trilogy, though I had a few issues with some elements. Minor spoilers to follow, though I’d say all are heavily foreshadowed early on and thus aren’t really spoilery.
Arden’s narrative follows two plotlines, both set toward the end of WWI though slightly separated in time. In one, beginning in January 1918, former battlefront nurse Laura Iven has been living back home in Halifax, Novia Scotia after being discharged with a medal and a serious injury. Early on in the book, she receives a box containing some personal items of her brother Freddie, who was serving in Belgium and is now missing and presumed dead. For various reasons, though, Laura believes Freddie may still be alive, and even if that remains unlikely, she wants to learn more about what may have happened to him. She thus heads back to the front along with two other women: Mary Borden, who runs a private hospital behind the lines, and Penelope Shaw (“Pim”), whose son has also gone missing in Belgium.
The other timeline (begun some months before in November 1917) follows Freddie, who is not dead but had been buried below ground in an exploded German pillbox along with a wounded German named Winter. The two eventually make their way back above ground but get separated after a harrowing journey back to “civilization”. Freddie (who in name and poetic bent may be meant to echo Wilfred Owen, the young poet who died in the War) takes apparent refuge with a mysterious fiddler named Faland, who appears periodically to soldiers who can enter his surprisingly intact and posh hotel, with his strange violin music and a mirror said to show those who look into it their deepest desire.
As the novel moves forward, the two plots eventually converge as Laura seeks out Freddie on the warfront (encountering Faland as well), and Freddie sinks ever deeper into the isolating and life-draining “refuge” of Faland’s hotel. Whether Laura will find Freddie in time is the driving force of the novel, and it remains a tense question throughout.
That overriding tension is one of the many strengths of the book. Another is Arden’s grimly vivid and sometimes lyrical depiction of the WWI hellscape, whether describing the trenches, the blasted-out land, the ruins, the wounds, the infuriating dichotomy between the soldiers in the field and their leaders in the châteaus sending them out to die, and more. Calling it a “hellscape” is semi-literal here, as Arden uses the surreal nature of the war, as well as its otherworldly nature, to graft her more supernatural elements onto the story. Often called the first “modern” war, WWI marked a turning point from one world into another, though one that was less a step through a doorway from the old to the new and more a layering over, for a while, of the two together, one atop the other. It was, after all, a war where soldiers in plumed hats rode horses at the same time other soldiers crept forward inside tanks, where infantry with bayonets marched in close order against machine guns, where the skies were filled with airplanes dropping bombs and also passenger pigeons carrying communications. Add in the miles upon miles of trenches and barbed wire, the craters from artillery, and the green clouds of mustard gas and “surreal”/”hellish” doesn’t even begin to cover it.
Pulling off one of my favorite elements of fantasy — making the metaphoric literal — Arden drops into this landscape (minor spoiler to follow) the one character who would (perhaps) feel at home. I call this a minor spoiler because I’d say it’s made pretty clear early on who Faland is meant to be, to the reader if not the characters. Even, I’d argue in a minor quibble, a little too clear too early, with his mismatched eyes lighting up “with unholy laughter,” his fiddle on which he plays “flawless music,” his “damned mirror,” and his name that, depending on one’s pronunciation, could be read as either “Foul Land” or “Fey Land.” Not to mention of course the chapter titles from Paradise Lost and The Book of Revelation. Beyond the unnecessarily (and unsuccessful) coyness regarding his true nature, Faland slots nicely into the same type of immortal creature we saw in the WINTERNIGHT trilogy with the Frost King Morozko. Not that the two are similar as characters but in the way Arden does such a great job, and sadly a relatively rare one, of presenting these immortal beings as truly different from you and I rather than as simply long-lived humans. Faland is not, nor should he be, “relatable,” nor is he truly understandable. Just as a fey being should be.
The scenes with Faland and Freddie are easily my favorite: for the surreal, fantastical nature of them; for the intensity of Freddie’s guilt and shame and fear; for the unholy bargain he considers that is, unlike Faland, wholly understandable even as it is also horrific and tragic; for the ever increasing dread and tension; and finally for the thematic question at their core: what do our traumas make of us and are we ourselves if we choose to give them up?
The scenes with Laura share a similar theme of loss, guilt, and trauma, of being haunted by the past (and here again Arden literalizes the metaphor), though they didn’t quite land with the same impact as Freddie’s storyline. Part of it is her story feels more external than internal. Another part is things fall in line a bit too easily for her, possible obstacles slid out of the way sometimes before they even arise, as when she needs to get back to the front, and she’s given a method immediately via Mary Borden. Similar easings of her path occur, but I won’t go into detail so as to avoid spoilers.
This was one of the issues I have with the novel. The other is that for as well written as it is (and it is absolutely well-written on a sentence level), as vivid its detail, as compelling as Freddie’s story is, some potential depth felt left on the cutting room floor. If the devil is real, then what does that mean for god? And if god is also real, as would seem implied, what does that mean for his existence side by side with the horrors of the war? The characters also seem to come to an acceptance of who Faland is, but almost with a shrug with little further thought given to it. And there’s another aspect that feel unnecessary (in fact, I’d say disappointing), more than a little out of the blue, and shockingly unexamined, but again, I don’t want to detail it, so I’ll just leave the complaint unfortunately vague.
Despite those issues, Arden’s lyrically rich prose, sharply visualized historical detail, deft hand with structure, tension, and the numinous, and the compelling nature of Freddie’s story make for a captivating story that is easy to recommend.
I’ll have to get this one.
I’m fascinated by the resurgence (or maybe just “surgence”) in WWI fantasy fiction. There’s something there–it may be the layering you allude to–it may be the sense of the first semi-global war and the “this is where we made our wrong step” kind of thing. Or it could just be that it’s a comfortable distance from which to be describing burned and blasted bodies, lungs destroyed, children murdered, rather than those same incidents we see on TV every single day. I don’t know. I guess I’m blathering.
Having now read it, I have a couple of responses to your review.
I wasn’t bothered by the ease of passage into the hellscape of war, basically because I was so delighted when the real-life Mary Borden showed up on the page that I was distracted from the plausibility of it. (Actually, I’d figured Laura was just going to go back as a nurse anyway, because that’s the kind of person she was.)
Thematically, only one “passage” in the book has to be difficult to travel, and she sold me on that one. Sold me more that once, actually.
Maybe the ease of *getting* to the front is part of the theme–metaphorically or literally, it’s easier to get into hell than it is to get out.
Where I would quibble with the relative ease of things is at the end of the book. I was willing to accept that the Parkeys, the three “weirds sisters” with their Ouija boards and seances, were more than Laura first thought, but I would assume there would have been bigger problems fitting back into Halifax post-war, if not for Laura, then for those she brought with her (one in particular). I wish Arden had spent one or two more sentences smoothing out how Laura go one specific character accepted into the community. I know there’s a need to “wrap things up” at the end, but…
All that said, having just finished it, I’m looking at my own work in progress right now and thinking how superficial and shiny-flat it seems. So… I guess that’s good for Arden, anyway.
I can maybe accept the idea of easier to get in than to get out, I like the idea of this, though I still think the number of times things fall into place throughout make it feel more like a plot convenience than a thematic enhancement. I agree about the end, for me both logistically (again–need to get home and poof, here’s how that happens) but also as you say fitting back in emotionally and socially (and especially as you say that “one character”). It wasn’t like the book was particularly long, so not sure a wrap-up was needed at that point–it was so immersive I would happily have gone along for more . . .
(rule 16 of writing: never ever compare your writing to another’s!. That way lies madness. And depression. And pain. And . . .)