Late Star Trek: The Final Frontier in the Franchise Era by Adam Kotsko
Adam Kotsko’s, Late Star Trek: The Final Frontier in the Franchise Era — no surprise given the title — explores the “strange new worlds” of the Trek universe from Enterprise onward, managing to get about as fully up to date as one can with publication schedules, missing only the very recent Section 31 film (apparently to Kotsko’s great benefit). Aimed at the layperson despite its close readings of the shows and cultural criticism, Late Star Trek is an engaging and thoughtful read.
As noted, the book begins (after a brief intro) with Enterprise, then has separate chapters on the tie-in novels, the “Kelvin Timeline” trilogy of movies begun by J.J. Abrams, Discovery, and Picard, followed by a single chapter covering Lower Decks, Prodigy, and Strange New Worlds. He wraps up with a general conclusion looking both backward and forward, and then offers up several appendices: a list of films and seasons from 2001 to now, a timeline of “key events” in the Trek universe, a notes section, and an index.
This is not an exhaustive list/description of episodes, a catalog of continuity issues, a rant against “new” Trek or a “get with the program” defense of it. Kotsko does reference multiple specific episodes, but in service of the big picture points he is trying to make about each show’s place in the Trek fictional world: what it arose from and what it led to, as well as the particular challenges each show faced (including meddling from corporate overlords, the shifting streaming landscape, trying to find a balance between creative freedom and canon/fan service), their successes, and their failures. He also steps back and examines throughlines, elements that unify the shows across the two or so decades.
One such example is a statement that threw me at first, that someone who entered the Trek universe via Enterprise might think that “Star Trek is about terrorism.” My first response was, “really?”, but then as he details how that plot point plays out again and again in multiple seasons of multiple Trek shows, I had to concede the point that while they might not think that was “all” Star Trek was about, they’d certainly come away thinking it was a major preoccupation. And that sort of, “huh, I never thought of that . . . “ response, which occurred to me more than once, is one of the main pleasures in reading a book like this.

Adam Kotsko
Another is the twin reaction of either agreeing or disagreeing with the author. Agreeing lets you nod your head and go, “hey, I’m just as smart as this superfan-slash-academic because I thought that too.” Or, more charitably (we all have our own levels of ego and pettiness), gives you the pleasure of a shared communion with another fan. On the other hand, disagreeing lets you shake your head and think, “can’t believe this superfan-slash-academic can be this wrong; clearly I’m the smart one in this author-reader relationship.” Plus, it gets the adrenaline going: “How could you possibly like/dislike that episode-season-show?!”
As one might expect in such a wide-ranging text, I moved back and forth between the two poles, sometimes in full agreement with Kotsko (yes, Discovery made its main character too much of a save-the-universe chosen one; yes, the fan service in season three of Picard got to be a bit much and did characters from the first two seasons more than a little dirty), sometimes in partial agreement, and sometimes in total disagreement (he’s more kind toward both Enterprise and Discovery than I would be). But whether agreeing or disagreeing, I never found fault with the thoughtfulness or depth of Kotsko’s discussion.
I do wish he had given the “minor triumphs” as they’re named — Lower Decks, Prodigy, and Strange New Worlds — more space, as I think all are both worthy of their own chapters as well and offer more than enough substance for analysis and comparison in the same mode and to the same degree he offers with the other shows.. And in the “if this were my book” vein of responding, I might have added two additional chapters. One on The Orville, which while obviously not a Star Trek show, certainly spins directly off from it and in many respects feels like a Trek show. And another to move beyond placing individual Trek shows within the Star Trek universe and place them as well in the larger TV sci-fi/streaming context in this time period, amidst the Star Wars TV shows, the Dr Who reboot, the plethora of quality sci-fi on Apple TV, etc. I recognize that’s a book-length topic to do it justice, but I wouldn’t have minded a shallow dip into that pool.
But those are minor quibbles. Overall, Late Star Trek is an excellent exploration, covering the material in thoughtful and insightful fashion, offering up some surprising ideas, making good connections, and displaying a willingness to be critically negative when deserved. And Kotsko’s voice throughout is clear, engaging, and inviting, whether one is a superfan, a casual fan, or just curious without a lot of background in the show. Well recommended.
It would give me very great pleasure to personally destroy every single copy of those first two J. J. Abrams movies. Oops, very sorry, Bill, but you got me started on a sore topic…. :)